From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-7114-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31202 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2003 02:58:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31177 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2003 02:58:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palrel12.hp.com) (156.153.255.237)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2003 02:58:54 -0000
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
	by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C115F1C00C06; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
	by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id hBI2wq2o020217;
	Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id hBI2wqVR024425;
	Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:58:52 -0800
Received: (from davidm@localhost)
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) id hBI2wq31024421;
	Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:58:52 -0800
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16353.6124.238859.232329@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:58:00 -0000
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Emacs dired problem triggered by NPTL-enabled glibc
In-Reply-To: <3FE1111F.3050700@redhat.com>
References: <200312162002.hBGK2TGM003186@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<3FE1111F.3050700@redhat.com>
Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2

>>>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:29:51 -0800, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said:

  Uli> The code in init.c was wrong.  There is no need to devide by
  Uli> two in this place.  In fact, the default stack size was wrong
  Uli> because of this.  I've checked in a patch.

Thanks, but I must still be missing something.  setrlimit() is
perfectly happy to set a non-page-size-aligned limit, so I don't
understand how the code in init.c could succeed if Emacs were to set a
limit that's greater than PTHREAD_STACK_MIN, but not page-aligned.

	--david