From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: i386 backtrace() question
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16676.37715.609457.479566@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
While tracking down an unrelated libunwind failure on x86, I came
across this curious test in sysdeps/i386/backtrace.c:
if ((void *) current < esp || (void *) current > __libc_stack_end)
The test is obvous for non-threaded programs. However, I'd like to
confirm that the test is OK for multi-threaded programs as well,
because all thread stacks will be allocated below __libc_stack_end.
I'm pretty sure that's true for Linux, though I'm uncertain about how
stack-randomization or other OSes would affect the validity of the
test. Could somebody confirm?
Thanks,
--david
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-19 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 11:47 David Mosberger [this message]
2004-08-19 20:56 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16676.37715.609457.479566@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).