From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-7844-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27833 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2004 15:10:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27787 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 15:10:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palrel12.hp.com) (156.153.255.237)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 15:10:40 -0000
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
	by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A42C40230A; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
	by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id i7VFAYtP018479;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i7VFAYEK029052;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:34 -0700
Received: (from davidm@localhost)
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i7VFAYkm029049;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:34 -0700
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16692.38122.52348.850833@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:10:00 -0000
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com,
	davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: fix ia64 longjmp() to work from alternate signal-stack
In-Reply-To: <412DAC31.1050404@redhat.com>
References: <16684.49335.802840.212013@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<412DAC31.1050404@redhat.com>
Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2

>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:24:01 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said:

  Uli> I don't like this.  The behavior of longjmp if the starting point is
  Uli> using the alternate stack while the destination uses the normal stack,
  Uli> is currently unspecified in POSIX.  I've asked for clarification in the
  Uli> POSIX working group.  The result I expect is "don't do it", aka,
  Uli> unspecified.

Were you able to get clarification on this issue already?

Thanks,

	--david