From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7917 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7900 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palrel13.hp.com) (156.153.255.238) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B581C0052B; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id iAC7txEv026860; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-16) with ESMTP id iAC7twKZ008664; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:55:58 -0800 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAC7tsSD008661; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:55:54 -0800 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16788.27786.496568.319975@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:56:00 -0000 To: Andreas Schwab Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: what are __ieee754_exp2l/__ieee754_log2l for? In-Reply-To: References: <200411102352.iAANqTq4002966@napali.hpl.hp.com> <16786.49872.956753.297728@napali.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:58:07 +0100, Andreas Schwab said: Andreas> David Mosberger writes: >> Can somebody clue me in on the meaning of the various >> math-library file-name prefixes? "w_" stands for "wrapper", I >> figured that one. But what's the idea behind the "s_" vs. "e_" >> prefixes? Andreas> I have no idea what they stand for, but s_ is used for the Andreas> functions without a wrapper, and e_ for the wrapped Andreas> functions. Ah, that helps, thanks! --david