From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: the setrlimit changes in glibc 2.1.3
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <20000112202122.A17645@lucon.org>
References: <200001122252.XAA00590@delius.kettenis.local> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001121843250.12491-100000@alien.devel.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-01/msg00088.html

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 06:44:33PM -0500, Cristian Gafton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> >  * If you now link against your shared library you get a warning about
> >    setrlimit@@GLIBC_2.0 undefined.
> 
> It's an error.
> 
> > Then either something went wrong during your built of glibc 2.1.3, or
> > there is a bug in the (static) linker.  To check what is really you
> > could do
> > 
> >    nm /lib/libc-2.1.3.so | grep setrlimit
> > 
> > This should output at least two lines looking like
> > 
> >    xxxxxxxx T setrlimit@@GLIBC_2.1.3
> >    xxxxxxxx T setrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
> > 
> > If this is not the case, something went wrong when buildig glibc
> > 2.1.3.  Otherwise it is most likely a linker bug.
> 
> I _do_ get that. The problem is that setrlimit@GLIBC_2.0 is different than
> the setrlimit@@GLIBC_2.0, which is what the liker expects to find.

Please send me a testcase. I will take a look. It sounds like a
linker bug to me.


H.J.