From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple definition of __libc_multiple_libcs
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000124160352.B16426@uni-koblenz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u8hfglubpm.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 05:35:01PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> With the current glibc 2.2, I received the following error message:
> /opt/egcs1.1.2/bin/gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/librtld.os '-Wl,-(' /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/dl-allobjs.os /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/libc_pic.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)'
> /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/libc_pic.a(init-first.os): In function `init':
> /libc-dl-wip/csu/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/init-first.c:61: multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs'
> /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/dl-allobjs.os(.data+0xe4):/libc-dl-wip/elf/rtld.c: first defined here
>
> Why do we have in sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c:
> int __libc_multiple_libcs = 0; /* Defining this here avoids the inclusion
> of init-first. */
>
> and also in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/init-first.c:
> /* Set nonzero if we have to be prepared for more then one libc being
> used in the process. Safe assumption if initializer never runs. */
> int __libc_multiple_libcs = 1;
>
> and why is this a problem on Linux/MIPS and not on Linux/ix86? I'm a
> little bit confused and appreciate your help.
>
> Is this a bug in binutils? On Linux/MIPS I use:
> $ ld --version
> GNU ld 2.9.5
Is this vanilla 2.9.5 or the one from oss.sgi.com with my patches applied?
I remember having fixed various bugs like this but it's too long since then,
forgot all the details.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-24 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-10 8:35 Andreas Jaeger
2000-01-10 9:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2000-01-24 14:46 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2000-01-24 23:46 ` Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000124160352.B16426@uni-koblenz.de \
--to=ralf@uni-koblenz.de \
--cc=aj@suse.de \
--cc=libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).