From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-5184-listarch-libc-hacker=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8205 invoked by alias); 2 May 2002 22:32:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8189 invoked from network); 2 May 2002 22:32:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO perdition.linnaean.org) (65.96.132.240)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 May 2002 22:32:27 -0000
Received: by perdition.linnaean.org (Postfix, from userid 5281)
	id C176C1BA18; Thu,  2 May 2002 18:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com>
To: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: write and kill in dl-tls.c
X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: 
   When George Bush projectile vomits antipasto on the Japanese.
Message-Id: <20020502223226.C176C1BA18@perdition.linnaean.org>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 15:32:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2

It seems improper that dl-tls.c:oom uses __libc_write and __kill and
__getpid.  Why not just use _dl_fatal_printf?  At the very least, use raise
instead of kill.