From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-5277-listarch-libc-hacker=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9465 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2002 06:42:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9449 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 06:42:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO perdition.linnaean.org) (66.31.41.65)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 06:42:58 -0000
Received: by perdition.linnaean.org (Postfix, from userid 5281)
	id D31881BA1B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
X-Fcc: ~/Mail/glibc-sc
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>,
	GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Copyrights patch
In-Reply-To: Ulrich Drepper's message of  , 9 July 2002 23:36:26 -0700 <1026282986.25809.60.camel@myware.mynet>
X-Zippy-Says: 
   Toes, knees, NIPPLES.  Toes, knees, nipples, KNUCKLES...  Nipples,
   dimples, knuckles, NICKLES, wrinkles, pimples!!  I don't like FRANK
   SINATRA or his CHILDREN.
Message-Id: <20020710064257.D31881BA1B@perdition.linnaean.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:42:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

> On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 02:52, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 
> >         * inet/getnameinfo.c: Deleted advertising clause from Inner Net License
> >         * sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c: Likewise.
> 
> Was this agreed to by the author?  This is *not* convered by UCB's
> decision.

Yes.  All copyright changes are carefully considered by the steering
committee with appropriate consultation with lawyers and necessary contacts
with other copyright holders before we make any changes.  In this case, we
got specific permission from Craig Metz to change the terms on his code.
In other cases where we change terms, we always secure necessary permission
first.  Noone on the SC will make any change like this without the full SC
having first agreed to all the details (and noone else should be making
such changes at all).  It's our job to be anal about this stuff, and we are.