From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10572 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2002 06:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10555 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 06:25:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 06:25:36 -0000 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g756ORH11776; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:24:27 +0200 Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 23:25:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Roland McGrath Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix IA-64 build Message-ID: <20020805082427.Y20867@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20020805002818.V20867@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20020805000733.70B351BA18@perdition.linnaean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020805000733.70B351BA18@perdition.linnaean.org>; from roland@frob.com on Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:07:33PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:07:33PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > I think the better solution is for those platforms not to have both modules > at all, or have one empty. Why have two idential syscall entry points > generated? I think you would get the right result by having an empty > lseek.[cS] in sysdeps/.../ia64 to override the unix/syscalls.list definition. > It might be handy to let syscalls.list indicate an empty module with a line > instead of adding the files. i.e.: > > llseek EXTRA lseek 3 __libc_lseek64 __lseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64 lseek > lseek llseek - > > so if llseek.o is built according to the first line, then lseek.o will be > made a dummy object by the second line. If it listed __libc_lseek, __llseek among aliases, it would work, yes. Jakub