From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23858 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 22:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23842 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 22:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.160.54.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 22:05:35 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F62357E; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8TLxel13894; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:59:40 -0700 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200209292159.g8TLxel13894@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Andreas Jaeger , GNU libc hacker Subject: Re: glibc make check fails... In-Reply-To: Ulrich Drepper's message of Sunday, 29 September 2002 15:00:23 -0700 <3D9777F7.7090702@redhat.com> Emacs: if SIGINT doesn't work, try a tranquilizer. X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 > If this happens the system is in deep trouble anyway. Indeed so. But the deeper the trouble, the more every little bit less of confusion can help the poor sucker trying to find the trouble. > The new thread code has all this cleaned up. It's just not worth it to > worry about the old code too much. Agreed.