From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-5670-listarch-libc-hacker=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32495 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 06:54:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32479 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 06:54:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 06:54:23 -0000
Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226])
	by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g926sGO27079;
	Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:54:16 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200210020654.g926sGO27079@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
To: drepper@redhat.com
CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Some SH patches
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:23:33 -0700"
	<3D9A90E5.20606@redhat.com>
References: <3D9A90E5.20606@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:54:00 -0000
From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

>> I've finally sent a SH TLS patch for binutils to the binutils
>> mailing list. Now it assumes fixed TLS instruction sequences
>> according to Uli's suggestion.
> 
> Thanks, I've applied the patch.

Thanks a lot.
 
> Can you send me at some point an updated version of the TLS description?

http://dodo.nurs.or.jp/~kkojima/gnu-on-sh/tls-sh-memo.txt

is, though it's not so complete.

Regards,
	kaz