From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32495 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 06:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32479 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 06:54:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 06:54:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g926sGO27079; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:54:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200210020654.g926sGO27079@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: drepper@redhat.com CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Some SH patches In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:23:33 -0700" <3D9A90E5.20606@redhat.com> References: <3D9A90E5.20606@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:54:00 -0000 From: kaz Kojima X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 >> I've finally sent a SH TLS patch for binutils to the binutils >> mailing list. Now it assumes fixed TLS instruction sequences >> according to Uli's suggestion. > > Thanks, I've applied the patch. Thanks a lot. > Can you send me at some point an updated version of the TLS description? http://dodo.nurs.or.jp/~kkojima/gnu-on-sh/tls-sh-memo.txt is, though it's not so complete. Regards, kaz