From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-5736-listarch-libc-hacker=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2002 03:43:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14241 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2002 03:43:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.163.212.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2002 03:43:25 -0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
	by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5FC22357E; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from roland@localhost)
	by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9J3hNn02855;
	Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:43:23 -0700
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:55:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200210190343.g9J3hNn02855@magilla.sf.frob.com>
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: ia64 t_scalar_t definition
X-shopping-list: 
   (1) Satanic democratic bomb travesty
   (2) Inauspicious prosecutors
   (3) Audacious connotation expectations
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2

t_scalar_t and t_uscalar_t are defined as 32 bits on ia64, while on other
platforms they seem to be the word size.  Is that really right?

These types seem only to be used by some STREAMS structures that nothing in
libc itself uses, so I don't know what if anything has ever actually used
these types.