From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7289 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 18:01:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7153 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 18:01:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 18:01:18 -0000 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAEI1Fr05343 for libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:01:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:01:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Glibc hackers Subject: errno, h_errno and _res Message-ID: <20021114190115.H6569@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Hi! One more thing about these. Shouldn't we change those 3 even in non-TLS builds from errno@@GLIBC_2.0 to errno@GLIBC_2.0 etc., so that new programs accessing these directly simply don't link anymore? Jakub