From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4797 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 20:43:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3037 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 20:39:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.163.212.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 20:39:56 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14DD357E; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAEKdtX18199; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:39:55 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211142039.gAEKdtX18199@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Glibc hackers Subject: Re: errno, h_errno and _res In-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek's message of Thursday, 14 November 2002 19:01:15 +0100 <20021114190115.H6569@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: Bariumenemanilow X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Unless I missed something, I didn't see any rationale about your moving the TLS symbols to GLIBC_PRIVATE. > Shouldn't we change those 3 even in non-TLS builds from errno@@GLIBC_2.0 > to errno@GLIBC_2.0 etc., so that new programs accessing these directly > simply don't link anymore? I've done this. But libpthread.so needs to refer to them, so I will have to do some kind of funny business to make that work.