From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15927 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 21:02:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15909 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 21:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.163.212.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 21:02:54 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479A7357E; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAEL2qs26739; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:02:52 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211142102.gAEL2qs26739@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Glibc hackers Subject: Re: errno, h_errno and _res In-Reply-To: Ulrich Drepper's message of Thursday, 14 November 2002 12:51:02 -0800 <3DD40CB6.9070203@redhat.com> X-Windows: complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems. X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 > Hasn't been discussed in mail. Jakub and I had a chat on IRC yesterday. > Exposing STT_TLS symbols seems unnecessarily risky in the moment. I > want to do some more studying of the effects before we do that. Ok, seems sensible. We already don't declare the __thread vars in any installed header, so no program has any business using them.