From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 519 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2002 22:05:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 502 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 22:05:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.160.55.155) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 22:05:55 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016136DE; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB7M04431433; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:00:04 -0800 Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 14:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200212072200.gB7M04431433@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add OUTPUT_FORMAT () into libc.so version script In-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek's message of Friday, 6 December 2002 16:00:35 +0100 <20021206160035.F1310@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Emacs: a Lisp interpreter masquerading as ... a Lisp interpreter! X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 I reimplemented this using a file that caches the result, and creating it with just one run with -v -Wl,--verbose and one pass of sedly goodness. I tested my sed script on hand-hacked output approximating what relevant platforms might produce, but only tried an actual real run of the new rules on i686-linux-gnu. Please make sure the installed libc.so is coming out properly in any other configurations you build, and let me know if I blew it. Thanks, Roland