From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12807 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2003 03:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12791 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2003 03:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 3 Jan 2003 03:56:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h033ukO23460; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:56:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200301030356.h033ukO23460@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Cc: toshiyasu.morita@hsa.hitachi.com Subject: Re: SH: optimized memcpy/memset In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:35:03 +0900" <200207100650.g6A6oRN18107@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> References: <200207100650.g6A6oRN18107@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 03:57:00 -0000 From: kaz Kojima X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 Hi, I wrote: > Ulrich Drepper wrote: >> On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 01:18, kaz Kojima wrote: >> >>> This patch gives an optimized memcpy/memset for SH. The original patch >>> was written by Toshiyasu Morita . >> >> We need an assignment. I don't trust semi-conductor companies >> contributing code without one. > > I'll request Morita-san to prepare an assignment for it. Now his and his company's paperwork with FSF has been done. So, is the patch ok? Regards, kaz