From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18155 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2003 02:06:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18139 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2003 02:06:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2003 02:06:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2T26n812294 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 11:06:50 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200303290206.h2T26n812294@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] SH: atomic.h fixes In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:23:04 -0800" <3E84F578.5030307@redhat.com> References: <3E84F578.5030307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:13:00 -0000 From: kaz Kojima X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 Ulrich Drepper wrote: >> BTW, the atomic operations in sh's atomic.h suppose a special >> kernel support. Should it be moved to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/bits? > > Yes, unless there are effort underway to standardize the interfaces for > SH/ELF in general. Would it be better to propose this move as a patch? Regards, kaz