From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31065 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2003 02:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31049 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2003 02:40:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2003 02:40:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2T2ef816570 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 11:40:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200303290240.h2T2ef816570@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] SH: atomic.h fixes In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:25:42 -0800" <3E850426.1070806@redhat.com> References: <3E850426.1070806@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:58:00 -0000 From: kaz Kojima X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > kaz Kojima wrote: > >> Would it be better to propose this move as a patch? > > If you say this is the right thing to do I'll move the file. A patch > isn't necessary. Yep, I believe it is the right thing at this stage. Regards, kaz