From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-6407-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4719 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2003 02:58:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4703 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2003 02:58:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2003 02:58:13 -0000
Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226])
	by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2T2wB818655
	for <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 11:58:11 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200303290258.h2T2wB818655@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
To: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SH: atomic.h fixes
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:39:26 -0800"
	<200303290239.h2T2dQu02066@magilla.sf.frob.com>
References: <200303290239.h2T2dQu02066@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:03:00 -0000
From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2

Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yes, there are no system calls. Please see
>> <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-05/msg00029.html>.
> 
> I see.  Nice scheme.  Please put some comments in bits/atomic.h explaining it.

It's a good idea. I'll come up with a patch. Thanks a lot.

Regards,
	kaz