From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17677 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 01:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17627 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 01:40:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.172.59.41) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 01:40:49 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0BD354C; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3N1emP27540; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:40:48 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200304230140.h3N1emP27540@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: GNU libc hackers Subject: libpthread_nonshared.a link order X-shopping-list: (1) Intrinsic infestations (2) Runcible retributions (3) Melodic imposition Johnny Carson lookalikes X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Would there be any harm in swapping the link order from libpthread.so libpthread_nonshared.a to libpthread_nonshared.a libpthread.so ? That works around an ld bug on ppc that makes glibc not build right now. The ld bug will get fixed. But if there is no harm to changing the link order, I will do that now so that ppc is not held up waiting for the ld fix. I think the details here are all the same for NPTL and LinuxThreads, though I have only tried the LT build on ppc lately. Thanks, Roland