From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31195 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 20:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31178 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 20:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 20:50:13 -0000 Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1]) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8OIlu2c022848; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:47:56 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8OIlumq022846; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:47:56 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:50:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Roland McGrath , Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set __libc_stack_end earlier on all arches, export back at GLIBC_2.1 Message-ID: <20030924184756.GL12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20030924134704.GK12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <16241.61056.949014.678340@napali.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16241.61056.949014.678340@napali.hpl.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:20:32PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:47:04 +0200, Jakub Jelinek said: > > Jakub> Also, for ia64, the __libc_stack_end setting code in > Jakub> RTLD_START should be removed, but removing of that requires > Jakub> rebundling the whole assembly. > > You mean something along these lines? (In my opinion, the explicit Yes. Thanks. Jakub