public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
	libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: getpid/vfork broken
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040308110105.GN3822@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403080237.i282bXG6004322@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:37:33PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The new specification for vfork where you can't even call dup2 is very
> close to useless.  The origin of vfork and true standard for its behavior
> that applications have been written for is 4.2BSD, where simple system
> calls were always safe, and getpid has always been the simplest system
> call.  The modern BSD specification remains that the address space is
> shared, with all that entails, but since getpid has never relied on data
> contents in the address space before, citing that as license to make it do
> the wrong thing is dubious at best.  Since the useless specification has
> been enshrined in POSIX, where vfork in fact never belonged at all, it is
> likely that every historical program will be broken and people will just
> have to adapt to giving up vfork entirely.  Progress.

Here is what would be needed to make vfork & getpid work together:

1) vfork needs to:
   struct pthread *pd = THREAD_SELF;
   int oldval = THREAD_GETMEM (pd, pid);
   int newval = oldval ? -oldval : INT_MIN;
   THREAD_SETMEM (pd, pid) = newval;
   actual vfork syscall (oldval must be saved in a register
			 preserved accross the syscall)
   THREAD_SETMEM (pd, pid) = oldval;
2) raise would need:
    /* raise is an async-safe function.  It could be called while the
       fork function temporarily invalidated the PID field.  Adjust for
       that.  */
    if (__builtin_expect (pid <= 0, 0))
-      pid = pid == 0 ? selftid : -pid;
+      pid = (pid & INT_MAX) == 0 ? selftid : -pid;

vfork is written in assembly for each architecture, so so that would need to
be coded for each architecture.

->pid field seems to be only accessed in raise, getpid and fork from libc.so
functions, when libpthread is loaded, THREAD_SELF->pid will always be
non-zero, getpid with THREAD_SELF->pid == INT_MIN will always do the real
syscall and while vfork is running, the same program certainly shouldn't
call fork() (neither in a signal handler nor in the vfork child).

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-08 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-07 23:18 Andreas Schwab
2004-03-07 23:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-08  2:22   ` Roland McGrath
2004-03-08  2:28     ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-08  2:37       ` Roland McGrath
2004-03-08 13:10         ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2004-03-09  1:28           ` Roland McGrath
2004-03-09  2:04             ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-09  3:50               ` Richard Henderson
2004-03-09  7:48           ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-09 13:01             ` Andreas Schwab
2004-03-09 13:59               ` [PATCH] getpid/vfork/raise fix Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-09 16:44                 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-03-09 19:38                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10  5:53                 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-10 10:37                 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-03-10 12:24                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10 14:33                     ` Andreas Schwab
2004-03-10 15:01                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10 15:06                         ` Andreas Schwab
2004-03-10 16:56                       ` David Mosberger
2004-03-10 17:02                         ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10 17:45                           ` David Mosberger
2004-03-10 18:19                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10 19:24                               ` David Mosberger
2004-03-10 18:44                   ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-10 19:18                     ` [PATCH] IA-64 pt-vfork fix Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-10 23:10                       ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040308110105.GN3822@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).