From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9434 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2004 18:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9416 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 18:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO md.dent.med.uni-muenchen.de) (138.245.179.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 18:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2589 invoked by uid 211); 30 Apr 2004 18:04:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040430180417.2588.qmail@md.dent.med.uni-muenchen.de> From: Wolfram Gloger To: jakub@redhat.com CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040430151958.GZ5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> (message from Jakub Jelinek on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:19:58 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix linuxthreads with pthread_attr_setstack{,addr} References: <20040429141901.GR5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20040429143129.GS5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20040430171450.2358.qmail@md.dent.med.uni-muenchen.de> <20040430151958.GZ5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 Hi, > It is in pthread_join's RATIONALE: > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_join.html Interesting. AFAIC remember, this has changed from when I looked at it in 2001. Although only in the "informative" section, I would actually welcome such a guarantee, and think we should make it possible to free application stacks after a return from pthread_join(). Regards, Wolfram.