From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19401 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 13:53:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19316 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2004 13:52:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.15.26) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2004 13:52:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1]) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i58Bch3j024123; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:38:43 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i58Bcgi2024115; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:38:42 +0200 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:53:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Steve Munroe Cc: Alan Modra , Ulrich Drepper , Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix backtrace in statically linked programs on ia64/x86-64/s390{,x} Message-ID: <20040608113842.GF5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20040608105735.GE5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:41:54AM -0500, Steve Munroe wrote: > > libgcc_s.so's unwinder has no way to get at the statically linked binary's > > unwind tables. For -static, we really want to use _Unwind_* stuff > > from libgcc_eh.a. > > > > Alan, Is this needed for PPC32/PPC64 as well? Neither PPC, nor IA-32 use unwind info in backtrace(3). Until they do, such change is not needed for them. Jakub