From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19877 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2004 20:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19821 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 20:04:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 20:04:51 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD16357B; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5FK4oOi009668; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:04:50 -0700 Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i5FK4lZB009663; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:04:47 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:04:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200406152004.i5FK4lZB009663@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Thorsten Kukuk , libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: asprintf/psignal.c change really correct? In-Reply-To: Andreas Schwab's message of Monday, 14 June 2004 20:16:43 +0200 X-Windows: putting new limits on productivity. X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 > 2004-06-14 Andreas Schwab > > * stdio-common/psignal.c (psignal): Don't use buf when asprintf > failed. This is clearly right. I've put it in. Thanks, Roland