public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix tst-timer{2,4}
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040811190238.GX30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)

Hi!

These two testcases segfault if timer_create fails, which is IMHO not a good
thing.  Using a timer_t after timer_create failed is also a bad example, so
we should avoid that.

2004-08-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* rt/tst-timer2.c (do_test): If timer_create fails, just continue.
	* rt/tst-timer4.c (do_test): If one of the timer_create calls fails,
	return 1 immediately.

--- libc/rt/tst-timer2.c.jj	2004-04-13 10:42:54.000000000 +0200
+++ libc/rt/tst-timer2.c	2004-08-11 23:02:39.938193370 +0200
@@ -40,7 +40,10 @@ do_test (void)
       printf ("cnt = %d\n", i);
 
       if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &sigev, &timerId) < 0)
-	perror ("timer_create");
+	{
+	  perror ("timer_create");
+	  continue;
+	}
 
       res = timer_settime (timerId, 0, &itval, NULL);
       if (res < 0)
--- libc/rt/tst-timer4.c.jj	2004-04-21 10:06:06.000000000 +0200
+++ libc/rt/tst-timer4.c	2004-08-11 23:08:57.886378961 +0200
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ do_test (void)
   if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ev, &timer_none) != 0)
     {
       printf ("*** timer_create for timer_none failed: %m\n");
-      result = 1;
+      return 1;
     }
 
   struct sigaction sa = { .sa_sigaction = sig1_handler,
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ do_test (void)
   if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ev, &timer_sig1) != 0)
     {
       printf ("*** timer_create for timer_sig1 failed: %m\n");
-      result = 1;
+      return 1;
     }
 
   memset (&ev, 0x33, sizeof (ev));
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ do_test (void)
   if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ev, &timer_sig2) != 0)
     {
       printf ("*** timer_create for timer_sig2 failed: %m\n");
-      result = 1;
+      return 1;
     }
 
   memset (&ev, 0x44, sizeof (ev));
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ do_test (void)
   if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ev, &timer_thr1) != 0)
     {
       printf ("*** timer_create for timer_thr1 failed: %m\n");
-      result = 1;
+      return 1;
     }
 
   pthread_attr_t nattr;
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ do_test (void)
   if (timer_create (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ev, &timer_thr2) != 0)
     {
       printf ("*** timer_create for timer_thr2 failed: %m\n");
-      result = 1;
+      return 1;
     }
 
   int ret = timer_getoverrun (timer_thr1);

	Jakub

             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-11 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-11 21:19 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2004-08-11 23:33 ` Roland McGrath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040811190238.GX30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).