From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16693 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2004 21:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16676 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 21:11:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.15.26) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 21:11:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1]) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i81Irc3j010764; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:53:38 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i81Ircs8010762; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:53:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 21:11:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Andreas Schwab , libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fix =?iso-8859-1?Q?ia64=2Fsys=2Fuconte?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?xt=2Eh_f=FCr?= g++ 3.5 Message-ID: <20040901185338.GL30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20040901172520.GA17065@twiddle.net> <413639ED.9040903@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <413639ED.9040903@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:06:53PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > If it's ok to include that here, sure. > > It's not OK, POSIX does not allow this. Can't it just use the hardcoded value (0xc8 or what was it) and do a glibc compile time check somewhere that it is the correct value? I mean, struct sigcontext shouldn't be changing at all, otherwise we're in big trouble compatibility wise. Jakub