From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-7922-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20353 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2004 16:12:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20335 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 16:12:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.202.64)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 16:12:56 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <2004092016125601600mvejue>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:12:56 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 892A863F50; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:12:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	gas2 Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only use -z relro if it actually does something
Message-ID: <20040920161255.GA30518@lucon.org>
References: <20040920132453.GM30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20040920155433.GA30187@lucon.org> <20040920155701.GN30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040920155701.GN30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 05:57:01PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:33AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:24:53PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > On ia64 ATM -z relro does nothing (but increase the size of program
> > > headers).
> > > H.J. disabled it because it interferred with linker relaxation
> > > (not sure if that still applies or what the testcase was).
> > > 
> > 
> > Can you point it to my change? I may recall something.
> 
> 2003-05-15  H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> 
> 	* emulparams/elf64_ia64.sh: Don't set COMMONPAGESIZE for now.
> 

Thanks. I opened a binutils bug

http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=393

to track it. I will check it out.


H.J.