From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5041 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2004 01:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5024 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2004 01:36:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2004 01:36:29 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055C4357B; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iA51aQXx004344; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:36:26 -0800 Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iA51aPf6004341; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:36:25 -0800 Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200411050136.iA51aPf6004341@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: second thoughts on using dl_iterate_phdr() for cache-validation In-Reply-To: David Mosberger's message of Thursday, 4 November 2004 17:28:56 -0800 <16778.55128.102064.331295@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: When George Bush projectile vomits antipasto on the Japanese. X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 > So when should I check back? You should take responsibility for the work you want done and continue improving it until you've submitted a patch that has nothing wrong with it. Please don't pretend there is some mystery about how to contribute effectively. > Fine; I don't mind changing it back to "unsigned long int". What is the documentation about the meaning of the values and the effects of overflow?