From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14446 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2004 20:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14430 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2004 20:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mysicka.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.15.26) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2004 20:20:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1]) by mysicka.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB1KKIs5002752; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:20:18 +0100 Received: (from jj@localhost) by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB1KKH4w002747; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:20:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:20:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Roland McGrath Cc: Steve Munroe , libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com, dgm69@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME Message-ID: <20041201202017.GN8259@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20041201104155.GL8259@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <200412012000.iB1K06bt004818@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412012000.iB1K06bt004818@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:00:06PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Did you just mean the s/#if #defined/#if defined/ in posix/tst-regex2.c? > > That's the only thing I found during testing... > > That's the only thing I noticed, but it indicated the patch wasn't tested. > > I don't like the __HAVE_CPUTIME stuff. Already on ia64 it is a runtime > determination if the clocks are available. So should I redo that just to call __sysconf (_SC_{THREAD_,}CPUTIME)? Jakub