From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25567 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2005 07:06:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25537 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO are.twiddle.net) (64.81.246.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0000 Received: from are.twiddle.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1A76mmi004304; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:06:48 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1A76mwS004303; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:06:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: are.twiddle.net: rth set sender to rth@twiddle.net using -f Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:06:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Roland McGrath Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FR-V PLT audit Message-ID: <20050210070648.GA4296@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Roland McGrath , libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com References: <20050210051559.GA3978@twiddle.net> <200502100643.j1A6hmek021559@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502100643.j1A6hmek021559@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:43:48PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > Indeed, what is the motivation for using an anonymous union rather than > each sysdeps/CPU/ldsodefs.h defining a macro for the appropriate thing? Or any macros at all? What's so special about the argument and result registers that require structure names to differ by target? We don't do that for sigcontext, or jmp_buf. r~