From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-8692-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7692 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2005 21:13:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 7642 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2005 21:13:07 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.15.26)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:05 +0000
Received: from sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBKLCtNh027784;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:12:55 +0100
Received: (from jakub@localhost)
	by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jBKLCtWO027783;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:12:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Steven Munroe <munroesj@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
        GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: things to do for arch maintainers
Message-ID: <20051220211255.GR4625@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <43A5B402.10007@redhat.com> <43A88034.8090500@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43A88034.8090500@us.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:05:40PM -0600, Steven Munroe wrote:
> Jakub got to the powerpc change before I could finish testing my 
> version. No problem with Jukub's quickness, but I notice that his 
> version does not fill in the
> 
> "#if defined NOT_IN_libc && defined IS_IN_rtld"
> 
> 
> case. While the X86_64 example does.

Uli did that part already earlier for
sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/setjmp-common.S:

#if defined NOT_IN_libc && defined IS_IN_rtld
        li   r3,0
        blr
#else
        b BP_SYM (__sigjmp_save@local)
#endif

as well as sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/setjmp-common.S:

#if defined NOT_IN_libc && defined IS_IN_rtld
        li      r3,0
        blr
#else
        b JUMPTARGET (BP_SYM (__sigjmp_save))
#endif

and mentioned it in his mail?  Or do you see it missing elsewhere?

	Jakub