From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-8868-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30357 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2006 01:41:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 30340 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2006 01:41:46 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:41:46 +0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
	by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 994B9357B; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by magilla.sf.frob.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)
	id 62DA3180A66; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:41:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Missing Sparc Implies
In-Reply-To: David S. Miller's message of  Friday, 24 February 2006 17:24:13 -0800 <20060224.172413.37789507.davem@davemloft.net>
Emacs: you'll understand when you're older, dear.
Message-Id: <20060225014143.62DA3180A66@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:41:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2

> From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:08 -0800 (PST)
> 
> > I don't think ought to be necessary.  If it is, I'd like to fix the
> > configure magic so it's not.  Those Implies files from the main source
> > should cause those add-on directories to be searched too.
> 
> This doesn't happen in the top-level either, that's why we need
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies and friends
> eventhough we have sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies.

I'm not following you.  The main tree tree has
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies already.
Another one should not be required in the add-on too.
The one would not be required either if we used sparcv9/sparcv9b instead.