From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-9005-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25505 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2006 20:56:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 25486 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2006 20:56:48 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:56:46 +0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
	by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A703F357B; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by magilla.sf.frob.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)
	id 9B413180050; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc64 build
In-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek's message of  Thursday, 10 August 2006 08:53:25 +0200 <20060810065324.GG4556@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
X-Windows: putting new limits on productivity.
Message-Id: <20060810205643.9B413180050@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2

Is there a reason sparc isn't using the sysdeps/posix/pause.c code?