From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-9284-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5143 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2007 22:43:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 5127 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2007 22:43:01 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mo11.iij4u.or.jp (HELO mo11.iij4u.or.jp) (210.138.174.79)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:42:56 +0000
Received: by mo.iij4u.or.jp (mo11) id l66Mgjdj012013; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 07:42:45 +0900
Received: from localhost (238.152.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.152.238])
	by mbox.iij4u.or.jp (mbox11) id l66Mgfuq004778;
	Sat, 7 Jul 2007 07:42:41 +0900
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:43:00 -0000
Message-Id: <20070707.074224.38692079.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
To: drepper@redhat.com
Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check_pf.c: Include alloca.h
From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <468EC0D1.5050104@redhat.com>
References: <20070707.065436.35682509.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
	<468EC0D1.5050104@redhat.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-hacker.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've said several times that I want those differences in the headers to
> be eliminated instead.  x86 and x86-64 set the standard and all other
> archs have to include the same headers.

Ok.  I'd like to see why alloca.h isn't included indirectly
in that case on SH.

Regards,
	kaz