From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25090 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2007 09:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 25073 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2007 09:05:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:05:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6I95FDt031257 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:05:15 -0400 Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (vpn-14-77.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.77]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6I95E9i009915; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:05:14 -0400 Received: from magilla.localdomain (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA47E357B; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by magilla.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 5281) id 9264A4D05CF; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:05:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Glibc hackers , Richard Henderson , Steven Munroe Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized __sched_cpucount for alphaev67, power5 and above and ia64 In-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek's message of Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:04:57 +0200 <20070718090457.GZ4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> X-Shopping-List: (1) Vacuous condiments (2) Seditious dirt (3) Impudent welts (4) Unforgivable expectations (5) Asymmetrical pancakes Message-Id: <20070718090513.9264A4D05CF@magilla.localdomain> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 > Maybe, though I'm not sure if we need one sysdep header for each such a > macro, that might be an overkill. No, one header for all macros of the ilk that come along would be fine. At a stretch, sysdeps/CPU/sysdep.h might even do. I almost suggested just adding it to bits/atomic.h, but it is probably preferable to segregate miscellanea from atomic/lock stuff in particular. Thanks, Roland