From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-9312-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20281 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2007 16:17:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 20264 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2007 16:17:46 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from are.twiddle.net (HELO are.twiddle.net) (64.81.246.98)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:42 +0000
Received: from are.twiddle.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by are.twiddle.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6IGHX2q025696;
	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:17:33 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by are.twiddle.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l6IGHVGl025695;
	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:17:31 -0700
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
        Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
        Steven Munroe <munroesj@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized __sched_cpucount for alphaev67, power5 and above and ia64
Message-ID: <20070718161731.GB25586@twiddle.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Steven Munroe <munroesj@us.ibm.com>
References: <20070717204719.GY4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070717204719.GY4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-hacker.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:47:19PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> in hardware.  For alpha I have used inline assembly, because
> __builtin_popcount would only expand to ctpop if the selected gcc
> arch is ev67, which isn't sure.

#ifdef __alpha_cix__
# define POPCNT(l) __builtin_popcountl (l)
#endif


r~