public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] i[456]86 rwlock fixes
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070730181254.GU4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)

Hi!

While working on i386 lowlevellock* updates (to match the x86_64/ppc changes
I posted as RFC), I found a couple of bugs in i?86 rwlock code and I think
it is better to post them separately outside of a huge patch, for
backporting etc. purposes:

1) if after futex returns -ETIMEDOUT or gettimeofday comparison jumps
   with -ETIMEDOUT stright to label 17 the internal lock isn't acquired
   immediately by lock cmpxchgl (== we jump to label 12), %ecx (which
   holds the saved futex return value) is first overwritten by
12:
#if MUTEX == 0
	movl    %ebp, %ecx
#else
	leal    MUTEX(%ebp), %ecx
#endif
   and afterwards inside of __lll_mutex_lock_wait (it will be
   FUTEX_WAIT).  This means the comparison with -ETIMEDOUT
   later on will be always false even if futex returned that
   error code and we'll loop again.  The effect of this will be that
   pthread_rwlock_timed*lock will be looping in this case until
   it manages to grab the internal lock immediately without having
   to wait.  I believe %esi isn't used for anything at this point
   (earlier it is used to hold some value from before unlock of
   the internal lock until the futex FUTEX_WAIT syscall), then
   to pass one of the arguments to that syscall, but then nothing
   until it is poped before ret.
2) only documentation issue in rwlock_unlock - the MUTEX != 0
   case uses wrong base register, fortunately MUTEX = 0 branch
   gets it right and we know MUTEX is 0.

2007-07-30  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock.S
	(pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock): Copy futex retval to %esi rather than
	%ecx.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock.S
	(pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock): Likewise.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_unlock.S
	(__pthread_rwlock_unlock): Fix MUTEX != 0 args to __lll_*.

--- nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock.S.jj	2007-06-04 08:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock.S	2007-07-30 18:10:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock:
 	leal	READERS_WAKEUP(%ebp), %ebx
 	movl	$SYS_futex, %eax
 	ENTER_KERNEL
-	movl	%eax, %ecx
+	movl	%eax, %esi
 17:
 
 	/* Reget the lock.  */
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock:
 	jnz	12f
 
 13:	subl	$1, READERS_QUEUED(%ebp)
-	cmpl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
+	cmpl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %esi
 	jne	2b
 
 18:	movl	$ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock:
 	call	__lll_mutex_lock_wait
 	jmp	13b
 
-16:	movl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
+16:	movl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %esi
 	jmp	17b
 
 19:	movl	$EINVAL, %ecx
--- nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock.S.jj	2007-06-04 08:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock.S	2007-07-30 18:10:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock:
 	leal	WRITERS_WAKEUP(%ebp), %ebx
 	movl	$SYS_futex, %eax
 	ENTER_KERNEL
-	movl	%eax, %ecx
+	movl	%eax, %esi
 17:
 
 	/* Reget the lock.  */
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock:
 	jnz	12f
 
 13:	subl	$1, WRITERS_QUEUED(%ebp)
-	cmpl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
+	cmpl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %esi
 	jne	2b
 
 18:	movl	$ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock:
 	call	__lll_mutex_lock_wait
 	jmp	13b
 
-16:	movl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %ecx
+16:	movl	$-ETIMEDOUT, %esi
 	jmp	17b
 
 19:	movl	$EINVAL, %ecx
--- nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_unlock.S.jj	2007-06-04 08:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/pthread_rwlock_unlock.S	2007-07-30 18:19:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ __pthread_rwlock_unlock:
 #if MUTEX == 0
 	movl	%edi, %ecx
 #else
-	leal	MUTEX(%edx), %ecx
+	leal	MUTEX(%edi), %ecx
 #endif
 	call	__lll_mutex_lock_wait
 	jmp	2b
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ __pthread_rwlock_unlock:
 #if MUTEX == 0
 	movl	%edi, %eax
 #else
-	leal	MUTEX(%edx), %eax
+	leal	MUTEX(%edi), %eax
 #endif
 	call	__lll_mutex_unlock_wake
 	jmp	4b
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ __pthread_rwlock_unlock:
 #if MUTEX == 0
 	movl	%edi, %eax
 #else
-	leal	MUTEX(%edx), %eax
+	leal	MUTEX(%edi), %eax
 #endif
 	call	__lll_mutex_unlock_wake
 	jmp	8b

	Jakub

                 reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070730181254.GU4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).