From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22236 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2008 21:32:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 22218 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2008 21:32:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:32:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TLWM2h006893 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:32:22 -0400 Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (vpn-15-19.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.15.19]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3TLWLpT021760 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:32:22 -0400 Received: from magilla.localdomain (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE5F357B; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by magilla.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 5281) id 43EAA26FA24; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:32:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove PT_IEEE_IP ptrace calls. In-Reply-To: Martin Schwidefsky's message of Tuesday, 29 April 2008 09:50:21 +0200 <1209455421.7852.18.camel@localhost> References: <1204908023.21438.8.camel@localhost> <20080307185837.523B827010F@magilla.localdomain> <1205136243.23606.11.camel@localhost> <1209455421.7852.18.camel@localhost> X-Zippy-Says: LOOK!! Sullen American teens wearing MADRAS shorts and ``Flock of Seagulls'' HAIRCUTS! Message-Id: <20080429213220.43EAA26FA24@magilla.localdomain> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:32:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > Made up you mind? I would like to see this patch in glibc accepted first > before we go ahead and remove the kernel code for it as well. What's the question? Your change was committed a month ago and is in the 2.8 release.