From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30260 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 08:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30244 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 08:01:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.mynet) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 08:01:42 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (myware.mynet [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.mynet (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7881bTo012637; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3D522561.2010209@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 01:01:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020804 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger CC: GNU libc hacker Subject: Re: malloc patch for 2.2 branch also? References: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > do we need this patch also on the 2.2 branch? I've added what is hopefully an equivalent patch. Not really tested, somebody might want to try it. - -- - ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9UiVh2ijCOnn/RHQRAge3AKCGakR/wm7mVLfj34ZDZHKalY/HIACePfD3 88mtIdUOqIU1c9O6iawLug0= =H3IX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----