From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22846 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2002 18:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22815 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2002 18:01:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.mynet) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2002 18:01:09 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (myware.mynet [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.mynet (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7AI12To003767; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:01:03 -0700 Message-ID: <3D5554DA.4090900@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:01:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020808 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger CC: GNU libc hacker Subject: Re: i386/strchr.S broken? References: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Ignore the patch - I understand the algorithm now. But now I'd like > to add a comment to it. > > Ok to commit to mainline? Yes, go on. - -- - ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9VVTe2ijCOnn/RHQRAlIKAJ9j7UGvRrTpCdjXZfVpRAmQYunJ/QCfdKt2 MHovDK9bwlREs2EUj+6r2ek= =escG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----