From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25306 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 06:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25234 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 06:23:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.akkadia.org) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 06:23:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (myware.akkadia.org [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.akkadia.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g926Nbqq014144; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 23:23:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3D9A90E5.20606@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:23:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20020812 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kaz Kojima CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Some SH patches References: <200210020513.g925D6O12889@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 kaz Kojima wrote: > I've finally sent a SH TLS patch for binutils to the binutils > mailing list. Now it assumes fixed TLS instruction sequences > according to Uli's suggestion. Thanks, I've applied the patch. Can you send me at some point an updated version of the TLS description? - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9mpDp2ijCOnn/RHQRAgZRAKCjAzCzr4QEA2NeOj3eeKey/RCJ0ACaAhtY +4wuJI6lsuLIw5iQvgJngFM= =0V6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----