From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17973 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2002 08:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17957 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2002 08:58:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.akkadia.org) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2002 08:58:40 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (myware.akkadia.org [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.akkadia.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g938xCqq008978; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:59:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3D9C06E0.40506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 01:58:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20020812 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix on sparc64, powerpc64 and x86_64 References: <20021003104504.Q3451@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Sending two versions of the patch, one not touching platforms other than > sparc/x86_64/powerpc, one how it should be done in the end so that route.h > is not problem for mips64, hppa64 etc. Pick one. The patch for the final for is harmless enough, I've applied it. Thanks, - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9nAbg2ijCOnn/RHQRAv3tAJ9srodQkjnznew92Q59yqb+LOubewCfej5F SV5BbAORVIzUHsP4nhYzXq0= =bPCA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----