From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5878 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 21:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5862 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 21:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.akkadia.org) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 21:23:38 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (myware.akkadia.org [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.akkadia.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gB5LNiYA022978; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:23:44 -0800 Message-ID: <3DEFC3E0.9050307@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:23:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland McGrath CC: GNU libc hackers Subject: Re: [mark@codesourcery.com: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter] References: <200212052114.gB5LEYh20830@magilla.sf.frob.com> In-Reply-To: <200212052114.gB5LEYh20830@magilla.sf.frob.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Roland McGrath wrote: > If that reference is indeed the spec, then this change needs to be made. > But before I put it in I am wondering whether there might be any gotchas, > i.e. existing binaries that depend on the erroneous behavior. If so, > we should do some versioning. I don't know. Weak undefined references to __dso_handle might be a problem. Just make the change. -- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------