From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17900 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2004 19:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17884 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2004 19:11:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO myware.akkadia.org) (24.221.190.179) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2004 19:11:20 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (drepper@myware.akkadia.org [192.168.7.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by myware.akkadia.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3AJAx1d002836; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:11:00 -0700 Message-ID: <407846C3.9040902@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:11:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: INTERNAL_SYSCALL and function calls in arguments References: <20040409071510.GA21965@suse.de> <407825B0.1010401@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Since the change only introduces temporary variables which the compiler > would create internally anyway, the compiler is perfectly capable to > optimize them away, and in all cases except sched_setaffinity the > generated code is virtually identical. I haven't asked about theoretical results. You must assume I'm stupid and don't know that this is possible. What are the concrete results? -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖