From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18041 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2005 08:00:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 17991 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2005 08:00:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:00:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBK80G3D009362 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:00:16 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBK80A127682; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:00:10 -0500 Received: from [192.168.7.71] (vpn50-126.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.126]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBK806c32492; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:00:07 -0500 Message-ID: <43A7B9BE.9050604@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:00:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20051129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thorsten Kukuk CC: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] time() syscall on i386 References: <20051216153017.GA15785@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20051216153017.GA15785@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 That's no good solution. It still leaves the implementation inconsistent with other archs. I've checked in a version which will always crash on invalid pointers. This is how x86-64 works and likely other archs with time support in the vdso. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖