From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25969 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2006 20:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 25952 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2006 20:52:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e36.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:52:20 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1RKqGDo009640 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:52:16 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k1RKsxQe161562 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:54:59 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1RKqFm8028842 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:52:15 -0700 Received: from [9.10.86.122] (spokane1.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.122]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1RKqFVj028795; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:52:15 -0700 Message-ID: <440368AD.3010308@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:52:00 -0000 From: Steven Munroe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc64; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050921 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland McGrath , GNU libc hacker Subject: Broken build from libc cvs trunk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 Roland are you in the middle of rearranging the lowlevellocking support? CVS trunk is broken with: ../nptl/lowlevellock.h:46: error: redefinition of ‘__generic_mutex_lock’ ../nptl/lowlevellock.h:46: error: previous definition of ‘__generic_mutex_lock’ was here ../nptl/lowlevellock.h:76: error: redefinition of ‘__generic_mutex_unlock’ ../nptl/lowlevellock.h:76: error: previous definition of ‘__generic_mutex_unlock’ was here Is there something the platforms need to do? or should we just stay out of your way ;-)