From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22909 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2006 15:53:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 22890 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2006 15:53:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:52:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78FqugG019911 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:52:56 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78FquFt001729; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:52:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.7.71] (vpn50-24.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.24]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k78FqW5S018620; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:52:37 -0400 Message-ID: <44D8B348.4000508@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:53:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix strtol_l.c for GCC 4.2 References: <20060808132217.GD4556@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060808132217.GD4556@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig847178997A6ED8C0D1ABDC70" Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig847178997A6ED8C0D1ABDC70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 394 It is IMO unacceptable that gcc is taking away one feature after another which allows writing efficient code without providing adequate means to express the same in acceptable ways. But of course gcc people don't care, they write only gcc's code where this is no problem. --=20 =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro St = =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 --------------enig847178997A6ED8C0D1ABDC70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 251 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE2LNI2ijCOnn/RHQRArl3AJ4iRS47/qqzbpnYYbjqsfHBHbhSigCdEHUr IUc5zpgneC2i15w6ylLat2E= =D88z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig847178997A6ED8C0D1ABDC70--