From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4556 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2007 15:50:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4491 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2007 15:50:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:49:56 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l57FjRpI001364 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:45:27 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l57FnYfb195318 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:49:37 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l57FnUYE002509 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:49:31 -0600 Received: from [9.10.86.122] (spokane1.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.122]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l57FnUXn001824; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:49:30 -0600 Message-ID: <46682D96.4040904@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:50:00 -0000 From: Steven Munroe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070301 SUSE/1.8_seamonkey_1.0.8-0.1 SeaMonkey/1.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Ulrich Drepper , Glibc hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ppc{,64} nextafterl and fpclassifyl References: <20070605155638.GO3081@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070605155638.GO3081@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Attached is a fixed version of nextafterl and fpclassifyl fixes Steven > sent privately a few days ago, together with a couple of fixes on top > of that from me. > This looks good, tested on powerpc32-nofpu, powerpc32, and powerpc64. Thanks again! > I have used attached tester to test whether nextafterl works correctly, > not sure if we want that in glibc testsuite (only tested on ppc/ppc64 > as it is ldbl-128ibm specific) or not, perhaps with smaller number of > tests. The 10 million iterations take ~ 70 seconds on my G5. > > Additional testing is clearly needed, but where would this fit into the tree. It is only ppc? I though other platforms where at least looking at ldbl-128ibm?